Main idea and its purpose
The Ishikawa chart was developed by Kaoru Ishikawa in the 1960s to measure quality control processes in the shipbuilding industry.
Ishikawa diagrams are sometimes called fisheye diagrams, herringbone diagrams, cause and effect diagrams, or Fishikawa. They are causal diagrams created by Kaoru Ishikawa to show the causes of a particular event. They resemble the skeleton of a fish, and the "ribs" representing the causes of the event and the final outcome appear at the end of the skeleton. The purpose of the Ishikawa diagram is to identify the problems that must be solved in order to obtain or avoid a particular event.
A fishbone diagram is a visualization tool for identifying the root causes of a problem.
Fishbone (Ishikawa) or cause and effect diagram – is used to find the causes of problems and group them into certain categories. That is why it is also called cause and effect diagram. Its creation begins with the identification of the goal or desired outcome or problem and the factors related to it. The causes are then analyzed for each factor. The image of the diagram somewhat resembles a fish asaka, which is why this method got the name fishbone.
Application guidance: scope of application, for example, when working with a group of a certain age and composition; in individual work, etc.
An Ishikawa diagram has several uses and can visualize potential causes of problems in many different circumstances. These diagrams are helpful for product developers when new items are being created.This also helps teams identify which resources will be needed at specific times to identify issues before they occur.
The fishbone technique is used to visually identify possible causes of a problem. This technique discourages partial or premature solutions and reveals the relative importance and interaction of different problem components. Steps:
1. On the board or large sheet of paper, draw a long, horizontal arrow across the entire platform, pointing to the right. On it, write the problem that will be the backbone of this "fish".
2. Draw the appendages of the bone (at a 45-degree angle to the 'spine'), where each appendage is a potential cause of the problem that can potentially be discussed. It is also possible to update sub-problems by displaying them as additions.
3. The group discusses each cause of the problem, starting with the simplest. This allows for clarity and many times explanations of the causes of the simplest problems make the complex causes irrelevant. Ideally, the fish's gills are redrawn and closer to the "head" are the most important problems.
Ishikawa charts are intuitive and easy to understand. By dividing the causes of the problem into different segments, the root cause can be better identified and eliminated. The method also has a flexible structure where the various "ribs" can be changed, removed or replaced as needed to suit a particular situation.
However, its simplicity can also be its greatest weakness, as it does not always reveal the size or importance of a problem, making it difficult to prioritize action. This means that small problems may receive more attention than they need, but large ones may receive too little attention. Since much of the input and interpretation of the chart is subjective, it can also lead to disagreements between participants who view the chart from different perspectives.
The results of applying the method, for example, increasing the ability to go beyond standard solutions, etc.
Ishikawa charts also help more accurate products when troubleshooting processes. If a problem occurs and management cannot find the cause, they can use Ishikawa diagrams to break the problem down into smaller parts until the root problem is found and solved.
Ishikawa charts are more useful when there is a known problem that the company can identify. The company must also be able to observe the problem, as this information will eventually feed into the chart. A diagram can be used to represent a management hypothesis about what happened and explain how the problem can be solved.
It is also possible to make the diagram in a positive form, that is, choosing not the problem as the central element, but the goal to be achieved and analyzing the aspects related to its achievement.
Choose a messenger:
Choose a messenger: